欧美电影影评

① 写一篇欧美电影的影评 急！！！！

《蜘蛛侠2》英语影评

So what's your choice between being a common person or a hero with people's respects? Most people will choose the latter. But what will be your choice if the cost is laying your lover among the risks? What will it be if the cost is you can never tell the girl, who you love so much, that you love her? The spider man had this contradiction. But finally he still chose the latter, not in order to be a hero, but to make this word peaceful.

I was so moved by the words the Aunt Mary said:

You will never guess what he wants to be, the spider man. He knows the hero when he sees one, too a few characters out there, flying all around out there, saving old girls like me. Lord knows kids like Henry need hero courageous, sacrificing for people, setting examples for all of us. Everybody loves a hero. People enthrone them, cheer them, scream their names and years later they will tell how they stood in the rain for hours just to get a glimpse the one who taught them to hold on to stand longer. I believe there is a hero in all of us. They keep us be honest, give us strength, make us noble, and finally allow us to die with proud. Ever though sometimes we have to initiatively give up the thing we want most, even our dreams. Spider man did that for Henry, so he wants to know where he is gone. He needs him.

The spider man got much from these words, so did I. And what about you? what's the hero lying in you?

② 求经典美国电影影评，最好是英文版的，中文也行，一个电影最好有多个影评 发776900490，非常感谢了

网上资源很多的，列举两个~
《肖申克的救赎》的英文影评 版本二邮件发给你

Though adapted from a Stephen King novella, "The Shawshank Redemption" has more to do with a man's internal demons than the kind that routinely rise up from overgrown graveyards. Like "Stand by Me," it's not a typical story from the horror King. Instead, it's a devoutly old-fashioned, spiritually uplifting prison drama about two lifers who must break their emotional shackles before they can finally become free men.

Set in a spooky old penitentiary with turrets and towers, the movie manages to be true to its Big House origins while incorporating such horrific mainstays as the clanking of chains and the creaking of the walls. There's even a raven that roosts in the prison library, where he is cared for by a darling old trusty (James Whitmore). For the most part, however, the movie expands upon cliches that date back to James Cagney's prison portraits梩he twisted warden (Bob Gunton) and the sadistic guard (Clancy Brown).

Director Frank Darabont, who apprenticed on B-scripts ("The Fly II") and TV movies ("Buried Alive"), manages to fashion an improbable new pattern from the same old material in his remarkable debut. While he deals with the grimmest aspects of prison life (sadistic guards, gang rapes and befouled food), Darabont is chiefly interested in the 20-year friendship that sustains Andy (Tim Robbins) and Red (Morgan Freeman) .

The movie opens in 1947 as Andy, a prominent New England banker, is on trial for murdering his wife and her lover. Not only did he have a motive, but he had the opportunity梙is footprints were found at the scene of the crime梐nd he had a weapon of the caliber used in the shootings. He insists that he is innocent, but the jury finds him guilty. Sentenced to life twice over, Andy is shipped to the maximum-security state prison at Shawshank, Maine. An introverted loner with an interest in reading, chess and rock carving, Andy doesn't make himself many friends until Red, a 30-year-veteran of the system, decides to take him under his wing.

Things begin to change for the better when Andy finds a way to use his skills and ecation to benefit his fellow felons. When he overhears the guard captain complaining about losing most of an inheritance to taxes, he offers to trade his advice for three beers for each of the men who are working with him that day tarring the roof.

His reputation as a financial adviser spreads, and soon he is doing the taxes for all the guards and running the warden's outside scams. This leads to a position in the tiny prison library, which Andy graally expands into the best ecational facility of its kind in the area. It takes him six years to do it, but Andy never gives up hope.

It is hope that allows the self-proclaimed innocent man to survive what may or may not be an unjust imprisonment. And hope is his gift to his friend Red, who no longer even tries to impress the parole board at his hearings. He's become "institutionalized," he explains to Andy, and would be a "nobody" on the outside.

Red's gift to Andy is absolution when he finally confesses his true sins. Whether or not he pulled the trigger, Andy blames himself for causing his wife's death; his redemption comes as he learns to give of himself over the course of this marvelously acted and directed film.

Robbins gives a performance that evolves with beautiful clarity from starchy banker to warm and loving friend. Freeman is sure to gain his third Oscar nomination for his portrayal of Red. He also reads the film's lovely narration, much of it drawn verbatim from King's 1982 novella.

A detailed portrait of the routine of cellblock life, "The Shawshank Redemption" might change a few minds about the usefulness of incarceration in terms of rehabilitation. Mostly, though, it reminds us of that we all hold the keys to our own prisons.

《楚门的世界》英文影评The Truman Show'' is founded on an enormous secret that all of the studio's advertising has been determined to reveal. I didn't know the secret when I saw the film, and was able to enjoy the little doubts and wonderings that the filmmakers so carefully planted. If by some good chance you do not know the secret, read no further.

Those fortunate audience members (I trust they have all left the room?) will be able to appreciate the meticulous way director Peter Weir and writer Andrew Niccol have constructed a jigsaw plot around their central character, who doesn't suspect that he's living his entire life on live television. Yes, he lives in an improbably ideal world, but I fell for that: I assumed the movie was taking a sitcom view of life, in which neighbors greet each other over white picket fences, and Ozzie and Harriet are real people.

Actually, it's Seaside, a planned community on the Gulf Coast near Tampa. Called Seahaven in the movie, it looks like a nice place to live. Certainly Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) doesn't know anything else. You accept the world you're given, the filmmakers suggest; more thoughtful viewers will get the buried message, which is that we accept almost everything in our lives without examining it very closely. When was the last time you reflected on how really odd a tree looks? Truman works as a sales executive at an insurance company, is happily married to Meryl (Laura Linney), and doesn't find it suspicious that she describes household procts in the language of TV commercials. He is happy, in a way, but an uneasiness gnaws away at him. Something is missing, and he thinks perhaps he might find it in Fiji, where Lauren (Natascha McElhone), the only woman he really loved, allegedly has moved with her family.

Why did she leave so quickly? Perhaps because she was not a safe bet for Truman's world: The actress who played her (named Sylvia) developed real feeling and pity for Truman, and felt he should know the truth about his existence. Meryl, on the other hand, is a reliable pro (which raises the question, unanswered, of their sex life).

Truman's world is controlled by a TV procer named Christof (Ed Harris), whose control room is high in the artificial dome that provides the sky and horizon of Seahaven. He discusses his programming on talk shows, and dismisses the protests of those (including Sylvia) who believe Truman is the victim of a cruel deception. Meanwhile, the whole world watches Truman's every move, and some viewers even leave the TV on all night, as he sleeps.

The trajectory of the screenplay is more or less inevitable: Truman must graally realize the truth of his environment, and try to escape from it. It's clever the way he's kept on his island by implanted traumas about travel and water. As the story unfolds, however, we're not simply expected to follow it: We're invited to think about the implications. About a world in which modern communications make celebrity possible, and inhuman.

Until fairly recently, the only way you could become really famous was to be royalty, or a writer, actor, preacher or politician--and even then, most people had knowledge of you only through words or printed pictures.

Television, with its insatiable hunger for material, has made celebrities into ``content,'' devouring their lives and secrets. If you think ``The Truman Show'' is an exaggeration, reflect that Princess Diana lived under similar conditions from the day she became engaged to Charles.

Carrey is a surprisingly good choice to play Truman. We catch glimpses of his manic comic persona, just to make us comfortable with his presence in the character, but this is a well-planned performance; Carrey is on the right note as a guy raised to be liked and likable, who decides his life requires more risk and hardship. Like the angels in ``City of Angels,'' he'd like to take his chances.

Ed Harris also finds the right notes as Christof, the TV svengali. He uses the technospeak by which we distance ourselves from the real meanings of our words. (If TV procers ever spoke frankly about what they were really doing, they'd come across like Bulworth.) For Harris, the demands of the show take precedence over any other values, and if you think that's an exaggeration, tell it to the TV news people who broadcast that Los Angeles suicide.

I enjoyed ``The Truman Show'' on its levels of comedy and drama; I liked Truman in the same way I liked Forrest Gump--because he was a good man, honest, and easy to sympathize with.

But the underlying ideas made the movie more than just entertainment. Like ``Gattaca,'' the previous film written by Niccol, it brings into focus the new values that technology is forcing on humanity.

Because we can engineer genetics, because we can telecast real lives--of course we must, right? But are these good things to do? The irony is, the people who will finally answer that question will be the very ones proced by the process.
如果你找不到，还需要的话，欢迎继续联系

③ 求经典外国电影影评---要英文版本的

珍珠港的影评

pearl harbour film review

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.

Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?

If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.

Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions

④ 一些欧美电影观后感

[一些欧美电影观后感]一些欧美电影观后感2009-06-13 23：10细细回忆起来，突然发现自己看过的电影还真是不少，挑选了一些自己感觉很不错的电影，小小推荐一下1.《海上钢琴师》，比起它的英文名《the legend of 1900》，我更喜欢这个中文译名，感觉，海上钢琴师这个名字，更能说清道明1900的纯洁与天赋，一些欧美电影观后感。看完整部海上钢琴师记得最清楚的镜头一是max与1900最开始相遇时在暴风雨中弹琴，二是1900第一次看见女主角时的表情，三是1900对max的那段经典的话："所有那些城市，你就是无法看见尽头。尽头?拜托！拜托你给我看它的尽头在哪?当时，站在舷梯向外看还好。我那时穿着大衣，感觉也很棒，觉得自己前途无量，然后我就要下船去。放心！完全没问题！可是，阻止了我的脚步的，并不是我所看见的东西，而是我所无法看见的那些东西。你明白么?我看不见的那些。在那个无限蔓延的城市里，什么东西都有，可惟独没有尽头。根本就没有尽头。我看不见的是这一切的尽头，世界的尽头。拿一部钢琴来说，从琴键开始，又结束。你知道钢琴只有88个键，随便什么琴都没差。它们不是无限的。你才是无限的，在琴键上制作出的音乐是无限的。我喜欢这样，我活的惯。你把我推到舷梯上然后扔给我一架有百万琴键的钢琴，百万千万的没有尽头的琴键，那是事实，max，它们没有尽头。那键盘是无限延伸的。然而如果琴键是无限的，那么在那架琴上就没有你能弹奏的音乐，你坐错了地方，那是上帝的钢琴。天啊！你…你看过那些街道吗?仅仅是街道，就有上千条！你下去该怎么办?你怎么选择其中一条来走?怎么选择"属于你自己的"一个女人，一栋房子，一块地，或者选择一道风景欣赏，选择一种方法死去。那个世界好重，压在我身上。你甚至不知道它在哪里结束，你难道从来不为自己生活在无穷选择里而害怕得快崩溃掉吗?我是在这艘船上出生的，整个世界跟我并肩而行，但是，行走一次只携带两千人。这里也有欲望，但不会虚妄到超出船头和船尾。你用钢琴表达你的快乐，但音符不是无限的。我已经习惯这么生活。陆地?陆地对我来说是一艘太大的船，一个太漂亮的女人，一段太长的旅行，一瓶太刺鼻的香水，一种我不会创作的音乐。我永远无法放弃这艘船，不过幸好，我可以放弃我的生命。反正没人记得我存在过，而你是例外，max，你是唯一一个知道我在这里的人。你是唯一一个，而且你最好习惯如此。原谅我，朋友，我不会下船的。"感动有时就是这么简单。2.《教父三部曲》，教父三部曲个人认为第一部最棒，马龙白兰度沙哑而低沉的声音配上教父的黑衣黑枪与红玫瑰，完美的组合，整部教父的气氛一直都很阴冷，然而中间有一点最让人感到温柔和温馨的地方，就是退休后的老教父维托·唐·科莱昂对儿子迈克说："我现在比以前爱喝红酒了，而且越爱喝就喝得越多。"迈克微笑道："喝吧，这对你的身体好，观后感《一些欧美电影观后感》。"一句话，温情四溢。3.《莫扎特》，很老的一部电影，也是我看的第一部关于音乐的电影，也就是从那时，爱上了莫扎特的音乐，电影中的莫扎特轻狂、天才，那招牌式的怪笑以及突然而至的弹琴片段将莫扎特的天才勾勒得淋漓尽致，而那一句："我是庸俗的人，但我保证我的音乐不庸俗！"更是将莫扎特的形象活灵活现起来，也许正是他令人无法直视的天才终究使萨利艾利忍不住的嫉妒害死了他。4.《卡萨布兰卡》，老电影，其实很早就看过这部电影，只是那时还小，不懂电影的内容，只觉得无聊。再看《卡萨布兰卡》已是初中时候，直到这时，才折服于故事的感人，以及鲍曼的演技，还有那一首男中音的卡萨布兰卡。5.《勇敢的心》，之所以喜欢这部电影，只是因为很少看到男女主角都悲剧的死掉，然而，当男主角华莱士刑前绝望凄厉的一声高呼"自由"响起时，才真正被他感动，这个男人终究用他的生命守护了苏格兰与他家族以及他的爱人。6.《钢琴家》，开始并不喜欢这部电影，总觉得斯皮尔曼太过懦弱，甚至为了生存不敢轻易触碰那家钢琴，然而，当看到最后斯皮尔曼忘情的弹奏起琴曲时，才真正被他对艺术的执着感动，可惜的是那位颇解琴意的德军警官最终身死，倒有些遗憾。7.《上尉的曼陀铃》，尼古拉斯·凯奇一向是我很喜欢的演员，从《风语者》到《火柴人》再到《恶灵骑士》《国家宝藏》，都是经典，然而我最爱的还是《上尉的曼陀铃》，其实，打动我的只有一句话，就是尼古拉斯·凯奇在行军时看到女主角是，叫的口号："3点钟方向，向美女致敬。"8.《黑客帝国》，纠结，仅用这两个字就可以形容黑客帝国，当我把黑客帝国三部曲看完后在回忆其中内容，终于被沃卓斯基兄弟给征服了，不过，貌似哥哥现在已经变性，新作《极速赛车》更是有些恶心，大感失望。9.《阿甘正传》，想来几乎只要提到老美的电影，阿甘正传永远都不会缺席，阿甘这个弱智儿给美国乃至世界都留下了深刻的影响，始终不能忘记，阿甘的经典名言："妈妈说过…"。10.《沉默的羔羊》，初看之时，吓了一大跳，但慢慢回忆起来，有感觉不错。很难想象一个人可以把吃人做得如此优雅，《沉默的羔羊》的前传《红龙》并没看完，不过还是很好奇汉尼拔如何从一个性格内向的小男孩蜕变为优雅而极富绅士风度的吃人医学博士。11.《壮志凌云》，汤姆·汉克斯这位帅哥的众多电影中，最喜欢的还是这部他的成名作，剧情不算离奇，然而青春热血异乎寻常，尤其音乐，很棒，那首《带走我的呼吸》，至今也应该算是奥斯卡名曲12.《天堂电影院》，是意大利导演托纳托雷的三部作品的第一部，却是我最近才看的一部电影，比起《海上钢琴师》《西西里的美丽传说》，《天堂电影院》丝毫不显青涩，从主人公萨尔瓦多穿越于尘封的记忆中，将过去的一切联系起来，尤其是那句"如果你不出去走走，你就会以为这就是全世界"，经典不过如此先写这么多吧，没什么时间，以后有空再补充它，目前，未完待续吧…2009-06-13 23：12|你丫再拖稿就整死你丫的以上2009-06-13 23：13|回复夏夜是罗森：不要jiba，千万不要jiba 2009-06-13 23：36|有时间写这么多观后感，还不去写小说，再拖下去爆死你丫的2009-06-13 23：38|你娃娃不要招惹我嫉妒你哈。2009-06-14 07：32|根本没时间看这么多。〔一些欧美电影观后感〕随文赠言：【人生舞台的大幕随时都可能拉开，关键是你愿意表演，还是选择躲避。】

⑤ 美国电影不可饶恕电影观后感

《不可饶恕》号称是美国西部片的终结篇，男主即导演克林特.伊斯特伍德在拿到剧本后的十年之后才拍这部电影，十年精心准备，更使电影增加了沧桑。

在这部电影中，没有人是正义的，没有明显的善恶之分。他们，不是一个受苦的群体，只是一个个人，为了自己的利益而存在的真实的人。

男主曾是个杀人不眨眼的专业杀手，连妇孺也绝不放过，可是，他却被感化了，有此能量的是男主的老婆，这部电影的女主克劳迪娅，那个长眠在地下已经三年的人。魅力就在此，她不在，却无处不在。整个电影被她温柔的气息所弥漫着。

我们不得而知，他们之间有怎样的爱情故事，她怎么会爱上了他，定是能窥见他的不同之处吧。或许爱是不需要理由的，爱啊，这微妙的东西。我爱上你不是你的责任，同样，不爱了，也不是你的错。

生活告诉我们，一个人是不太容易被改变的，特别是那种有恶习的人。若是，那定是一种超乎寻常的力量，十年时间，克劳迪娅让男主远离杀戮，戒掉了酗酒，安静的生活了下来。想起了水滴石穿，以及润物细无声。总之，男主安于现状了。现在的他养鸡，喂猪，在猪圈打滚，连拉住一只猪的力气也没有，怎会曾是个无所畏惧的杀手。

他打靶，骑不上马，围着马打转。他说这些牲畜是为了他以前所做的事而惩罚他。看的出对以前所做的事他在真心的悔过，他体质似乎很差，在雨地里行走，却拒绝喝酒御寒，因为他已经戒酒了。

他终于挨不住发烧了，到达小镇后他给警长侮辱，鞭打，毫不还手，他爬出酒店，跌进雨里。一种隐忍，能屈能伸的姿态向大家呈现着。造成的假象是，这个人和杀手的距离有些遥远了。

他终于畏畏缩缩的完成任务。目的是为了能拿到那笔钱，使孩子能过的好点最后的激情燃发是在得知老友被打死后，他一连杀了5个人，这5个人，该死么？可他们却被打死了。

他的气场震慑了在场的所有人。他离开了，最后还不忘说一句，要好好安葬他的老友，对妓女好点也许他本不想去的、只是一念之差。温柔终究战胜了暴力，从此，放弃了恶念。

整部电影暴力场面比比皆是，而电影传达给我们的恰恰是反暴力的，一种柔的力量越来越博大，植入了人们的心田。不得不说男主的演技给电影增色不少。

难忘的还有黑人妻子冷冷的目光，虽然在电影中，自始自终她没说一句话，她只是目送丈夫和男主的离去。她知道，她的每一句话都是多余。这里的不言胜过了千言。

⑥ 外国电影观后感

转一篇网友写的肖申克的救赎的观后感

《肖申克的救赎》，影片男主角之一“安迪”，普通人，一如你我，无辜入狱且被判两个无期徒刑。在黑暗的监狱统治下，安迪用“深埋心底二十年的希望碎片”冲破“死灰般绝望的命运”，最终完成对自己和狱中友人“瑞德”的伟大救赎。

肖申克监狱迎来被判两个无期徒刑的无辜银行家安迪，经过一番裸体的冷水冲洗和石灰粉消毒，然后领两套监狱制服，外表柔弱的安迪便正式成为肖申克监狱的永久居民。当监狱的第一夜来临，许多犯人嚎啕大哭，安迪没有发出一点声音。当“姐妹花”想把安迪当成他们的泄欲工具，一次次的反抗换来一次次的殴打，脸上常有伤痕的安迪没有发出一点声音。当监狱新来的犯人可以证明安迪的清白，但监狱长却设计杀了犯人，企图把安迪彻底沦为自己洗黑钱的工具，把他关在黑暗密封的囚房里几个月，但安迪还是没有多余的话语。他唯一可以做的就是用他手指大小的锤子一点一点的挖牢房的墙壁，二十年磨成一剑。

Believe what you want. These walls are funny. First you hate ‘em, then you get used to ‘em. After long enough, you get so you depend on ‘em. That‘s "institutionalized." “你愿意怎么认为就怎么认为。这些高墙很有趣的，一开始你恨它，然后你逐渐习惯，等时间足够长的时候，你就该依靠它了。这就是’制度化’。”一开始，很难想像出狱不是一件很好的事情吗？勇敢的心从开始到结束一直贯穿始终的不就是自由吗？为什么，那个老人出狱反而那么无助呢？看着他出狱，坐在车上，双手紧握前一排的椅子，非常无助，非常无奈的表情。一个人已经习惯了一种生活，虽然，监狱里的生活在我们看来，可能是非常黑暗，阴森，恐怖的。但在里面已经生活了50年的人来讲，那儿就是一切。他的所有都在那儿。

另外还有一件事“安迪是对的，我终于明白他为什么发笑了。如果用这种石锤挖在墙下挖隧道，会让一个人挖上六百年！”没有一个人相信Andy会用一把小锤子挖出这样的一条通道。那是梦想，梦想总有一天，会重新获得自由，希望只有是自己给自己的。只要前方有希望。我们才有活下去的动力。活着一定要精彩，不精彩活那么久干什么？

Andy在监狱里给参议员写信后，图书馆给Andy寄了许多书过来，包括许多黑唱片。Andy选择了大家分享。精神上的感受，远比物质上的感受重要得多得多。这是我的感受。Andy坐在椅子上，双腿搁在桌上。闭上双眼。用心去感受那意大利女人唱的。瑞德的话，很好的解说“我可听不懂这一天那两个意大利女人唱得什么，说实话，也不想知道，有些事情不说出来更好。我是想说她们唱得太好了，无法用语言来形容，好得让你心痛。”“告诉你们，那声音激扬。比这个灰色地方里的任何人敢于梦想的都要遥远、高昂。就像鸟儿振翅飞进我们枯燥的牢笼将围墙释放……就在那一刻—肖申克的每一个人都感到了自由。”瑞德说出了Andy心中的信念。一直以来，始终没有放弃过的信念。现实中，这些事情，每天都在发生。说实话，许多时候，美景就在跟前，只是我们没有好好去珍惜。把目光放在远处，相信，如果我到了那儿，我就很幸福。我们匆勿赶路。却没有想到，这条欲望的路是没有尽头的。而我们因此错失了许多值得珍惜的事和物，最重要的还有人。许多时候，珍惜就对了！就像安迪知道放那首歌肯定会得到惩罚，但他还是牢牢抓住这一瞬间。不让他从指缝间溜走。

⑦ 美国电影《弱点》的英文影评和梗概

梗概：

The film tells of a homeless African American boy, Michael och, who was an orphan since childhood and met the kind Mrs. Taoxi. With the help of the latter, he finally became the first selected player of the American National Football League.

影片讲述了一个无家可归的非洲裔男孩迈克尔·奥赫从小就是一个孤儿，遇上了好心的陶西太太，而在后者的帮助下，他终于成为了美国国家橄榄球联盟的首批被选球员。

评价：

This is a typical American theme film. Although it has its hypocritical side, it really moves people's hearts. It uses an ordinary person's personalized road of success to interpret the level of social development and national feelings.

这是一部典型的美国主旋律电影，尽管有其伪善的一面，但真正做到了打动人心，是用一个平凡人的个性化成功之路来诠释社会发展水平和国民情怀。

人物

1、莉·安妮·陶西

一位和蔼、友善、极有责任心的白人养母。陶西的儿女与迈克尔在同一个学校就读，她看到迈克尔一人徘徊在街上便把他带回了家。陶西一家都非常喜欢迈克尔，最后他们决定领养他，让他成为家庭的一员。

2、迈克尔·奥赫

一个无家可归的非洲裔男孩迈克尔·奥赫从小就是一个孤儿，一再的从领养家庭中逃走后终于遇上了好心的陶西太太。

⑧ 美国丽人影评

《美国丽人》的主题背景就是一个混乱的家庭，导演把丈夫、妻子、女儿、邻居和女儿的同学都杂糅到一个混乱的生活体系内，用最夸张的手法撕碎“美国梦”的题材电影。

《美国丽人》作为一部美国家庭伦理的黑色喜剧，虽然体现了导演深厚的艺术功力，但也没能给观众以准确的答案。事实上，家庭经营本就没有固定手段，只能靠自己悟出经营心得，这才是电影的魅力所在。

这部影片着眼现实生活，多多少少带着一些富有争议的情节。不少人初观此片，会被这些劲爆情节吸引，或兴奋，或不齿。随着生活阅历的增长与对影片了解的深入，观众会发现，这部电影恰是对家庭生活的真实再现。面对荒唐的现实，它不止于简单的嬉笑怒骂，却借着主人公之口，劝诫众生，颇有悲天悯人的情结。