❶ 拜託了，急啊！勇敢的心 英文觀後感
Hills, bagpipes, mist, the word 「Scotland」 written along the bottom of the screen – it can only be one place. That』s right, Wales. Nah, only joking – as if anyone would ever make a film about Wales.
Mel Gibson both directed and starred in this tartan-clad epic about William Wallace, the legendary Scottish freedom fighter/terrorist who, even way back in the 14th Century, had already had enough of the English going on about winning the World Cup in 1966. So, armed with just some rocks, a few hundred muck-dwellers and an extremely peculiar accent, he led a nation to fight for freedom from English tyranny. Or something along those lines.
It』s actually fairly appropriate to be so vague about all of this, because nobody really knows all that much about the real Wallace (and most of what we do know comes from a poem). You could spend a lifetime picking apart the historical inaccuracies in the flick, and there would still be those who』d disagree with what you found.
Because of that, how much enjoyment you can get from this 177-minute beast depends largely on your willingness to accept Wallace as a charmer with biting wit and a permanently clean-shaven chin. As the sort of bloke beautiful French princesses would hand over national secrets to simply because of the way he looks at them. Or even just as a guy who doesn』t smell like moss.
The most breath-taking, if gruesome, parts of the movie are the incredibly lifelike battle scenes. Putting them together must have been an immense project to undertake, but you』ve got to hand it to Gibbers – he does it very, very well. He also makes a likable hero figure, providing you can put to the back of your mind the fact that he』s basically playing the original ned.
Personally I find the movie far too long, particularly as parts of it play like a TV advert for the Scottish Tourist Board. In one scene, for example, Wallace sprints to the top of a mountain and just stands there, kilt billowing, for no apparent reason. Anyone who』s ever worn a kilt will of course know that the last place you』re likely to linger is a-top a windy Scottish mountain. Talk about 「freedom」!!
2
Long before The Passion of the Christ, Mel Gibson directed another cinematic masterpiece, Braveheart. Filmed against the backdrop of majestic mountains and rolling meadows, it tells the historically-based (yet not entirely accurate) story of William Wallace, a common man』s warrior who led the Scottish people in rebellion against King Edward I, also known as 「Longshanks」. Written by Randall Wallace, an American tourist fascinated with a Scottish statue of his namesake, the script collected st in Hollywood for over a decade before Gibson made the brilliant decision to put it on the big screen. Just like The Passion, it』s a decision he would not regret.
Set in the 11th Century, Braveheart catalogues the struggle of Scottish serfs who labor under the brutal oppression of English occupation forces. Amidst these terrible conditions, William Wallace (Mel Gibson) falls in love with Murron MacClannough (Catherine McCormack). Insistent on not sharing his wife (a proclamation by the king gives local rulers 「first-night rights」 to new brides) Wallace secretly marries Murron. Nevertheless, an English knight assaults her, sparking a fight with Wallace. Fleeing the village, Wallace believes Murron has escaped and will soon meet him at a secret rendezvous point. But Murron is captured and executed by the king』s emissaries.
Angered by his wife』s murder, Wallace instigates a local rebellion, slaughtering all the king』s loyalists in his village. As his rebellion grows, a distraught Longshanks (Patrick McGoohan) dispatches his fabled Northern Army to destroy it. But the heroic Wallace delivers a stirring speech to rouse his men, while deploying an ingenious battlefield trick to defeat the king』s cavalry.
With the power and legend of Wallace growing day by day, Longshanks relies on his daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau) to broker a truce. But Isabelle』s power is limited, and Wallace realizes his people can only win freedom if backed by the Scottish nobles. Their appointed leader is Robert the Bruce (Angus MacFadyen) who vacillates between his own idealistic views and his father』s pessimistic pragmatism. Will the nobles join with Wallace? Will the Scots win their freedom? Only history tells us the answer.
With elaborate costumes, vivid battle scenes, and a noble hero as its focal point, Braveheart is more than your typical run-of-the-mill action movie. Part history, part Hollywood heroism - its timeless idealism strikes a cord with every viewer. In fact, the movie itself led to a revival in nationalistic pride that fueled the successful Scottish independence movement of the 1990s. It』s a testament to the strength and character of the real life William Wallace. A thousand years later, his enring legacy continues to transform the European landscape, and Mel Gibson captures the noble warrior』s passion with an awe-inspiring Academy Award-winning masterpiece.
3
BRAVEHEART is set in Scotland in the 1200s. It tells the true story of William Wallace who was a famous commoner who led his people in a rebellion against the English. The movie is of epic proportions, length and grandeur. We learn the entire history of William Wallace from the age of 8 until his death.
Mel Gibson, in what I found to be his best role ever, plays the grown up Wallace. Gibson directs the movie as well. The story is full of fascinating history of which I knew little. I have a good English history background but was surprised at what little early Scottish history I knew. Wallace wants to live in peace and ignore the English atrocities he has witnessed, but circumstances force his hand, and he declares war on the English. His battle cry is freedom and many poor people follow him in his quest. The story itself is quite compelling, and the script is excellent.
The political intrigue among the Scottish nobles makes you wonder whose side they are on. As the story unfolds, you come to realize that they are only interested in enriching themselves and do not care about their own people. They constantly counsel Wallace to compromise his ideas in order to achieve some lesser, but more practical solution. His vision is a singular one of freedom for his people. I found myself thinking of Gary Cooper in THE FOUNTAINHEAD and the similarity between his role and that of Gibson's. All of the leaders who were the "wisest" urged constant compromise on their rising young stars in both movies.
Actually, the movie most like BRAVEHEART is GETTYSBURG for both had huge and realistic battle scenes with wave after wave of humans charging each other and dying. Of course, many people will compare BRAVEHEART with ROB ROY. They are both about old Scottish heroes, and in my book, BRAVEHEART wins hands down. Finally, you may find yourself thinking of the Judas story from the Bible except here the movie has a plethora of Judases.
One example of the quality of the script is that the writer manages to introce a very funny character without it seeming like merely a plot device, which of course it is. This character is a mad Irishman who steals every scene he is in with his dialog. I laughed out loud many times. Although there was little humor in this serious tale, there was just enough to keep me from ever tiring even though I had to stay seated for three hours.
Too often period pieces seem like merely exercises in style. I found QUEEN MARGOT to be one such movie. Here the wonderful costumes and set decoration feel totally authentic but in a natural way. I felt like I was actually in the thirteenth century where people's faces were frequently dirty and in general personal hygiene was minimal. When they made their kills in battle or in revenge, I could sense how close they were to animals then. The blood would splat on their faces, and they could just as easy have been wolves.
I have been to Scotland many times and it is gorgeous. In a low key but quite impressive way, the cinematography makes one feel the beauty and the isolation of countryside. The music with the recurring and haunting melody of the lone Scottish bagpipe sets a sad and yet serene tone and mood.
BRAVEHEART runs a long, but well worth it, 2:52. I would not want it shorten. It is rated R, but NC-17 would be more appropriate. It is THE goriest movie I have ever seen and that too I would not change because it allows one to vicariously live through what actual battles in that period would be like. Please be warned that you will see almost every part of the human body being chopped off or stabbed in one scene or another. Imagine any physical horror, and there is probably a scene of it in BRAVEHEART. Nevertheless, there was not one scene where I thought the violence was gratuitous. I would let older teenagers see the movie, but would be careful with impressionable younger ones.
4
When pagan Saxons invaded Britain pushing the native Celtic tribes back in the mountains of the west and the north of the country they couldn't have known what difficulties they leave to future generations. One of the difficulties were Scots, though they weren't much affected by the pagan invasion.
Throughout the history, Scots (as a tribe from Ireland was in 360 mentioned by Romans) had a changing luck in battles, whoever they fought. They had had many various allies and fought against many various enemies, including their former or future allies (politics).
Originally based in Ireland, the Scottish tribe later established their kingdom on the west coast and isles of today's Scotland (between years 501 and 503). Generally, they were never good friends with tribes which lived on the isle, called Britannia by the Romans, before them; perhaps because they came from Ivernia, today's Ireland...
The intolerance between the two sides resulted in many battles and rebellions. In 600, 300 Edinburgh horseman were killed by the English, in 1014 king Malcom II defeated the Danes, four years later another victory was won on the river Tweed, at Carham, against the army of Anglo-Saxons (particularly Northumbrians). On the other hand, king Duncan was defeated by the English and killed by famous character of the Scottish history, MacBeth, who is defeated in 1057 by Malcolm Canmore in the battle of Lumphanan etcetera etcetera.
Then, in the year of approximately 1272, William Walace is born in Ellerslie. He is fated to become one of the most important characters of the history of Scots. In age of twenty-five years, he kills sheriff (originally shire-reeve) of Lanark and a revolt is unleashed. Perhaps many Scots were waiting for a leader to emerge, because the same year Wallace defeats the English at Stirling Bridge.
His luck changed when he was defeated at Falkirk in 1298. In 1305, he is betrayed and executed brutally, his head being mounted on London Bridge.
That is a very rough outline of a life so very important, of the life of William Wallace, a thorough Scot, exactly the William Wallace about whom this movie is. His father was killed by the English, his wife was murdered by the sheriff of Lanark (which is a reason why the sheriff ended up equally) - no mercy could have been awaited from a man that had never seen mercy on the side of his enemies.
Braveheart is a heroic epic told compactly and relatively objectively, noticing everything important that most probably happened in the life of William Wallace. After all, it doesn't have to be historically exact - it is a legend and even if it was "only" a legend, it would be a most impressive one.
5
Back in 1995 when I first saw this movie I was wowed, it was a cinematic epic and one which I thoroughly enjoyed.... a few years later when I met my future spouse I was subjected to this movie on a weekly basis and now I cannot bare to watch it.
Anyway back to the movie, if you have been living under a rock and haven't seen it here's the basic story Mel Gibson plays William Wallace a Scottish highlander who leads his people in a uprising against the English monarch.
Now just so you know this film however "based" on historical events is completely inaccurate, Wallace was in actual fact a Scottish Noble (his family was rich), Wallace never had a wife, and the French princess Mel gets jiggy with would've been around 8 years old at the time, the only real truth in the movie was that he was hung drawn and quartered and he lead an uprising...the rest is Hollywood bullsh*t.
I'm giving the film 4 stars because if you are unaware of the historical inaccuracies and you haven't seen it 100 times you will be entertained, its a good movie.
❷ 求一篇英文電影的中文觀後感（適合初中的）
《勇敢的心》英文電影中文觀後感
我最近剛看了<<勇敢的心>>深有感觸啊!華萊士對自由的追求深深的感動了我們.
年幼的華萊士身處被英國統治的蘇格蘭,從小就感受到統治階級的殘酷,其父也在一次反抗運動中喪生,年幼的華萊士跟著叔叔游歷歐洲,後來華萊士成為一個智勇雙全的男人,回到故鄉的華萊士又一次受到了殘酷的壓迫,他深愛的妻子被英軍無情的殘害.這又一次激發了華萊士心中對自由的渴望,只不過這時他不再是那個軟弱無力的小傢伙,他可以為自由去戰斗.他拿起了長劍指向了敵人,他連戰連捷.我們不僅看到了一個鬥士的血性,我們還看到了一個男人的智慧.
然而事情並不總是那麼順利,蘇格蘭貴族階級的背板,使華萊士身陷囹圄,最後在刑台上受到敵人的極刑,然而他並沒有屈服,最後華萊士傾盡全力長呼：「自――由――」,這時一個男人逝去,而一個英雄誕生了
Every man dies, not every man really lives
讓我們像華萊士一樣去戰斗
❸ 《勇敢的心》英語影評，還要有翻譯的，急急急
After 3 months\' seeking I finally found the movie BRAVE HEART yesterday, which won many awards, especially the Oscar Award of 1996. But the real reason what made me so curious and looking forward to this movie is because of another well known one, GLADIATOR. These two were same kind and they all were with high comments on the web.So, when I got it, I was about to watch it at the New Year\'s Eve.
At the beginning , I was attracted by scotland pibroch, slow and comfortable voice spreading between mountains and valleies, and inside the voice you can hear a little bit grieve, it hint us that\'s an ancient tragedy story. But with the development of the story, I was a little disappointed, because the scene couldn\'t shock me. As if a man who was used to Chinese Vodka, ER GUO TOU, he would lose interesting at beer. That\'s same. You know, It was proced 10 years ago, and ring this decade, MATRIX, THE LORD OF RING, KING KONG, etc. , luxury digital effect, grand and breathtaking scenes , shocked background music, all these had strengthen our nerves, and this made us not easily get into any other movies. Anyway, we should feel lucky, because we had seen so many excellent works.
Another point I had to mention is Mel Gibson, in this movie, he was not only the first actor, but also the director, oh, he was so great.
《勇敢的心》觀後感
經過3個月的搜尋，昨天我終於找到了《勇敢的心》這部獲得了很多獎項的片子，特別是1996年的奧斯卡。但是讓我對之好奇，並非常期望的真正原因是另一部片子，《角鬥士》。他們都是同種類型，並且都獲得了很高的評價。所以，當我找到它時，特意放在昨晚看。
剛開始，我就被蘇格蘭風笛所吸引，舒緩的音樂在山谷間傳盪，而在這聲音中你能聽到一絲哀愁，它暗示這是個古老而悲傷的故事。但是隨著故事的展開，我有點失望，因為它沒法吸引我。就像一個習慣了「二鍋頭」的人，實在無法對啤酒感興趣一樣。要知道，這是部10年前的片子，在這十年間，《黑客帝國》、《指環王》、《金剛》等等大片，豪華的數碼特效，恢宏令人窒息的場景，令人震撼的背景音樂，所有這些已有效的麻痹了我們的神經，使我們無法再輕易的進入其他的電影中。但是，我們應該感到幸運，因為我們已經看過了這么多優秀的作品。
另一點不得不提的是梅爾.吉普森，在這部片子中，他不僅僅是主演，而且是導演，真是厲害！
❹ 《勇敢的心》英語影評,急
當蘇格蘭風笛的聲音奏響，鏡頭像戴在鳥的翅膀上一樣，幽雅地掠過藏青色的山巒，白霧從小河上升騰起再散開，鏡頭不斷地拉近，樹林間出現了人馬的影子，電影就開始了。一個男人的聲音在此時響起：「我將為你們講述威廉姆華萊士的故事，英國的歷史學家們會說我在說謊，但歷史是由處死英雄的人寫的……」在父兄的葬禮上，小Wallace在眾人的憐憫中沒有說話，一個人默默的感傷。更加年幼的Murron一直在關注著他，當眾人都離開的時候，小女孩掙脫了母親的手，從平靜的土地上摘下了一朵紫色的薊花送給小Wallace。當他接過花的時候，那是我在電影中唯一一次看見他的眼淚大滴大滴地流淌在眼眶之外。他的眼淚可以忍受看到被吊在房頂上扭轉著蒼白面容的屍體時恐懼，可以忍受失去至親時的莫大悲痛，卻承受不住一朵野花的關懷。說是宿命也好，他們此後的人生便因為這次的邂逅誰也逃不了對方的宿命。長大成人的他們在曾經的小村莊重逢，在教父的見證下秘密地完婚，在月色樹林中完成了人生中重要的成人禮，一切順理成章而無限平靜。正如Wallace所希望的那樣，他希望過著平靜的生活，成家、娶妻、生子。本來我以為他們的愛情會更加長久和轟烈一些的，沒想到卻因為Murron被英國的軍官割喉而死而讓他們的「在一起」戛然而止。
失去了愛人的Wallace再也找不到平靜的可能，心中註定屬於英雄的抗爭和對自由深深的信仰讓他成為了神話般的領袖。我看到的蘇格蘭的男人們是穿著裙子上戰場，光著屁股挑釁，光明正大地侮辱敵人的。為了所有的人而拋棄了自己的人就是英雄。成了英雄以後的Wallace用腦子打仗，用身體屠戮，捍衛自己除去愛人後最後的信仰。馬背上的人生盪氣回腸，刀光劍影中的鐵血柔情熱烈。
在金屬的鏗鳴和濺血的戰歌中，因為錯信，因為背叛，因為脆弱，戰場成了墳場，還穿著蘇格蘭裙的屍體互相壓著，插滿的刀劍，被騎兵的馬蹄碾碎的臉。婦女們在悲傷地尋找無數相似的屍體中屬於她們的丈夫、兄長、兒子、父親，無限悲涼殘酷。有人說，無數的生命被層層疊疊的沙土埋葬，直到沉陷到大地是最深處，一切的感情和生命一同消失。歷史的代價是慘重的，人類用血鑄造輝煌，用血鋪墊和平。
Wallace最後還是義無返顧地去奔赴用死亡換取的賭注，在最後等待死亡的過程中，他對愛著她的王妃說：「每個人都會死，但並不是每個人都真正的活過。」獨身一人的時候，在死亡前在獄中的最後一刻，他也會祈禱：「我很害怕，賜予我力量去面對死亡吧！」因為他也不知道他是否能在莫大的痛苦中將自己的信仰和尊嚴捍衛到最後。當英國的人民把他當作叛國罪人一樣唾棄，為他的即將死去而歡呼，當他看見刑場下兒童對著他的死而微笑的時候，我知道那樣的無知是一種莫大的傷害。當他飽受疼痛，在生命的最後，深深地吸滿最後一口氣，在眾人都以為他請求開恩的時候，他用一生的力量大喊了一聲：「freedom
」本來我以為只要我不說話，我就不會哭的。但是在那一刻，我竟不知不覺讓眼淚流了下來。十年前，也有很多人曾經為這樣的一幕哭過。這是一種深深的震撼。
Wallace終究是死了，曾經兩度失信的Bruce在陣前對著蘇格蘭人，深深地吸一口氣，喊道：「你們曾經和華萊士一起流血!」他抽出長劍來，「現在，請你們跟我一起流血吧!」
蘇格蘭高地人振奮了，他們發出了震天動地的叫喊聲：「Wallace——Wallace——」於是，他們打得如詩一般美麗，打得一點都不失蘇格蘭人的面子，為自己贏得了Wallace同樣信仰和追求的自由和勝利。
那把無數次在Wallace手中出現的劍被插在一大片綠地上，劍柄上紅色的綢帶一直飄揚到影片的最後，就像是勝利者的墓誌銘。
蘇格蘭風笛再次響徹的時候，我已經無法繼續平靜了。勇敢的心像英雄一樣的難得。
我相信，電影是活生生的藝術。但是生活是更加真實的，赤裸裸的電影。
❺ 勇敢的心英文觀後感
[勇敢的心英文觀後感]Let us recall again the side to see the long process of history, how to create heroes, you will find from our own side, a life .There is a direct their shadow. First, the inheritance of childhood Wallace is not natural endowment from the hero, at best, is the future generations of civilians, although his father had led a The small protest, as compared to his later, many of immature, unsuccessful factor. His father was then the representative of the civilian population, he uprising, power lies not in its own class on free awareness and evaluation. Some Sense, he is in the conspiracy of hate and who are loyal to the feudal lords of the country against the conviction, not even defeat Opponents of intent, only to let him know that tyrant, civilians also have the courage to fight. England foot-long expansion annexation to the Scottish territorial ambitions, cloth snared all participants in the peace negotiation of the assassination of the Scottish your People, young retainers were not spared. With tears in his eyes. He finally knows what death is, it is meant losing familiar with the cordial, no longer has sufficient warmth. The film, his uncle put on his chin, said the sentence: "You truth your mother." The meaning of this statement is not as simple as literally, is only the appearance he sighs, only the sense of loneliness and fear Steep The Wallace declare: We are a, you still have to rely on close relatives.It was at that time Wallace explanation: He is one of the sentimental and weak heart.His uncle was a wise man, his brother died more than understanding the purpose and significance of protest. He has to learn Latin Wallace, Tell Wallace, learn how to use weapons, must first learn how to use the brain is more important to God through Latin understand where -- The truth was given to the people free. Young Wallace, of course, not completely understand this, he also constantly immersed in the native land of lost loved ones and seek grief Lane. In the dream his father and dialogue, his father said to him: "Heart is not detention, have the courage to pursue!" This undoubtedly is Health The earliest meaning of life Enlightenment. Wallace\'s uncle with his travels in Europe, he grew up in the maturity only after it will inherit from two ancestors on the Po Your legacy: good sense and courage, with his search for life from the free.Second, the aspirations of lifeOthers audience to participate in the wedding and let him do not realize that, in his country under the rule of the transient beauty, never impossible Emerging from the shadow of torn. No girl could escape long legs invention of the power with the intention of attracting domestic and nobles in Scotland reassuring presence on the land development. Such a person may be deprived of Road privileges, no doubt makes a deeper civilians heavy oppression. White bride no time to put her husband\'s embrace, it was rushed to the suppression of the British aristocracy. The groom in anger in the anti-intent Anti immediately by the sword on the neck-coercive. Bride inner scales choose his life, it Fukai swords hand, The ears of language, the wife finally let the vicious power by force, was forced to enre the pain of killing beloved cutter cut. At such times, the personal anger and resistance are so insignificant.
❻ 跪求一偏《勇敢的心》英語作文觀後感，要求原創，200詞以上帶翻譯，重謝……
Braveheart was a huge deal when it first came out. I never really watched the film properly until recently. As a frequent cinema-goer since my youth I was not a part of the mid-nineties cultural phenomenon that was Braveheart's release in Scotland. I did turn up at the the cinema, the old Odeon in Edinburgh, but the queue went round the block (the literal term for a blockbuster) and there was no way in hell I was prepared to wait for three hours on a gray September afternoon (a choice I came to regret). Every subsequent attempt since then was blocked. I never rented the video as I didn't want to watch in pan-and-scan. The fact that every single living Scottish person had seen it apart from myself really got on my nerves, and I was quite bitter about it. And then, as the fever died down, I just kind of forgot about it and moved on.
Watching it fully as an alt I think I probably enjoy it more now that I would have done as a teenager. It's certainly a huge epic right up there with the best of them. Mel Gibson captures the pretty side of Scotland wonderfully with his scope photography accompanied by James Horner's bittersweet score. The film never really feels three hours long, the time just disappears.
Nearly every notable Scottish actor (apart from Connery and Connelly) appears at some point. From the brilliant (Brian Cox) to the dreary and pretentious (Peter Mullan). Keep a lookout for Tommy Flanagan too, in one of his earlier roles.
The battle scenes are impressive, but I wish there were more gory. Gibson's first cut of the film was apparently bloodier, I wish it had remained intact. But despite the grim satisfaction of seeing the English aggressors getting splattered the fact that Scotland IS still ruled by England kind renders Wallace's bravery irrelevant. It may have been 700 years ago, but I hate the fact that he ultimately died for nothing. We DON'T have a country of our own, plain and si-mp-le.
華萊士，終其一生都是一個鬥士，一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士，一個為了自由而斗的鬥士，一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士。他是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長，對他而言，真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞，他只是一種震嚇，一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後，他變得勇敢，敢於直面死亡了，面對他父親和哥哥的遺體，他變得如此平靜。再後來，他叔叔把他帶走，說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗，把他帶去接受教育，這個是他的故事的開端，也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情，這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫，一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘，一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因，他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了，這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神，一種本能的叛逆。但他們的愛情沒有維系多久，因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了，貴族殺了梅倫，這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線，因為這引發了華萊士的爆發，揭竿而起，各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀，包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在，根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤，讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈，她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺，因為失去了梅倫，他一直在為了他的信念作戰，皇後的美麗和善良感動了他，兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
再說說他的戰斗，華萊士開始戰斗的時候，是因為貴族殺了他的妻子梅倫，可以說是一個簡單的復仇行動，但事情一開始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是領導權掌握在一個聰明人的手裡。後來，他們起義得到了各地不斷的支持，這讓人看到了蘇格蘭的自由希望。一個方面是因為他們蘇格蘭的人受迫壓太久了，再加上華萊士所學的智慧，他們勢如破竹，這就很讓人，特別是愛德華心慌了。想盡辦法招安華萊士，最後還是利用了一個騙局把華萊士抓了。
最後，在砍頭台。這里是這部片的一個精華了，思想就是在這里的。行刑前，兩個小丑在那裡舞盡丑態，讓人發笑，但也是說明了英國人的行為恰恰就是兩個小丑所為。華萊士就刑，行人對這位英雄扔雞蛋、爛菜，恰恰說明了國民的麻木和愚昧。後來在刑台上，華萊士受盡了各樣殘酷的折磨，下面則是一片歡呼聲。華萊士就刑前，看到那個小孩在笑，可能這里也是一個希望的延續，把希望寄託給了後人。那聲振饋發聾的「freedom」讓人久久不能放下思想，激人不斷前進。可以說，在刑台這段，是鮮明的對比讓這個自由的精神體現的淋漓盡致的。一邊是鬥士、英雄，一邊是愚昧的國民;一邊是前進中的先鋒，一邊是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在這里體現了，代溝在這里產生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼?也許是真的，我們也該好好思量思量。
望採納！~~
❼ 求勇敢的心觀後感一篇，英文的，300字左右
1
Wags enjoy razzing the 13th-century Scottish epic Braveheart, starring Mel Gibson in the role of freedom fighter William Wallace, as Die Hard in a kilt. Wait till they get to the knobby question of how Gibson's knees stack up against Liam Neeson's in Rob Roy. No matter. Gibson gets the last laugh. Braveheart resists glib categorization. This rousing, romantic adventure is laced with sorrow and savagery. The audacity Gibson shows as the film's director extends to the running time, which is nearly three hours. Hamlet, with Gibson playing the melancholy Dane, was shorter, and Braveheart isn't Shakespeare. Don't panic. Though the film dawdles a bit with the shimmery, dappled love stuff involving Wallace with a Scottish peasant and a French princess, the action will pin you to your seat. With breathtaking skill, Gibson captures the exhilaration and horror of combat in some of the most vivid battle scenes ever filmed.
Wallace was knighted for leading his people in the fight against domination by England. Few facts are known about his personal life, which frees Gibson and screenwriter Randall Wallace (no relation) to run with the legend passed down mostly from the rhyming verse of a poet known as Blind Harry. It's a shame that Harry predates Hollywood by five centuries -- he could have made a killing cranking out kick-ass crowd pleasers.
Gibson's Wallace is a potent blend of Robin Hood, Attila the Hun and, yes, the wags were right, Detective John McClane in Die Hard. Wallace could relate to any story that pits one pissed-off fighter against the system. He faced an English army led by bad-to-the-bone King Edward the Longshanks, played by Patrick McGooban in a classic portrait of slithering sadism. Wallace also had to inspire Scottish peasants and nobles to follow his lead against daunting odds.
It's a ripping yarn, and Gibson could have slid by with the usual hack heroics. Kevin Costner's Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves did just that and still earned a pile. Gibson does it the hard way with attention to detail. He has retained the keen eye for character he showed in The Man Without a Face, his promising 1993 directing debut. Wallace doesn't spring to life as a full-blown legend, though he does speak Latin and French when he returns to his village in Scotland to settle down as a farmer and marry Murron (the meltingly lovely Catherine McCormack), his childhood sweetheart. It's the brutal fate dished out to Murron by the English that makes the farmer an outlaw.
That's when Wallace organizes the villagers into a ragtag militia. Brendon Gleeson's Hamish, James Cosmo's Campbell and Alun Armstrong's Mornay register strongly, as does David O'Hara's Stephen, the Irish warrior who joins the Scottish cause. The teasing camaraderie botched in Robin Hood is expertly handled here. Gibson's impassioned performance as the hero who would not trade his freedom for English gold doesn't shrink from showing the barbarian who emerges at a call to arms.
"Are you ready for war?" Wallace shouts to his outnumbered troops at Stirling. It's the film's first major battle scene and a triumph for Gibson. Trying to stir hundreds of fatigued soldiers to action, Wallace rides his horse back and forth in a frantic effort to be heard. In most historical films, the stationary star manages to move multitudes with a throaty whisper. Gibson jettisons the Hollywood fakery. Riding among the men, his face streaked with woad (a blue dye used to terrify the enemy) and his voice hoarse from yelling. Wallace is a demon warrior crying out for vengeance.
Cinematographer John Toll, an Oscar winner for Legends of the Fall, thrusts the audience into the brutal frays at Stirling, York and Falkirk. Superbly edited by Steven Rosenblum (Glory), these sequences recall the blood poetry of Welles' Chimes at Midnight and Kurosawa's Seven Samurai. Sophisticated weaponry was centuries away. The Scots used hammers, axes, picks, swords, chains and even farm tools to crack skulls as they battered the English in the mud. They also set oil traps on the ground to burn their enemies, though shields and chain mail offered scant protection against the rain of English arrows. "Quite the lovely gathering." says Longshanks, surveying the carnage and dispatching his officers to send in Irish volunteers instead of expert English archers. "Arrows cost money," he sneers.
Gibson's handling of Wallace at war is so thrillingly done that one regrets the subplots that distract from the action. Wallace's flirtation with the king's French daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau), is fanciful fluff that undercuts his undying love for Murron, and the king's homophobic revenge on his preening son, Prince Edward (Peter Hanly), and the son's boy toy, Phillip (Stephen Billington), comes off as inexplicable gay ting. Judicious cutting might have sharpened the film's focus and impact.
Still, don't get your kilt in a bunch over a spectacle that provokes such lively debate about the method and madness of war. Filmed with furious energy and surprising gravity, Braveheart takes the measure of a hero with a taste for blood to match his taste for honor. Wallace is an inspiring, unsettling role, and Gibson plays him, aptly, like a gathering storm.
2
Braveheart is an action/drama movie about William Wallace (Mel Gibson). The film is no less than amazing in any way. Though the movie sports us with a 177 minute run time, it is amazing to see the interesting way in which, Mel Gibson behind the camera, works his magic. As the acting is magnificent, and the war sequences are brutal and violent, the film works out as a movie which will always be remembered as a classic.
The film focuses on William Wallace, growing up as a kid, his father was a fighter. After his death, his uncle took him in to watch over him, and teach him how to fight. When he is older though, he meets Murron MacClannough(Catherine McCormack). After he weds with her, she is murdered. Now avenging her death, William sets out ot fight for his freedom, his justice and the right to live.
Mel Gibson did really an amazing job on capturing the character of William Wallace. Putting on the Irish accent, he shows us that he is a great actor and can do some things which we never thought he could do. Behind the camrea though, Mel is a completely different kind of person. He captures the fight scenes perfectly and beautifully. The one thing that was done well though, was the greatly realistic violence and brutal warfare of the film. The violence is spilled nicely, and realistically.
3
Braveheart is another film directed by its star, Mel Gibson. Close on the heels of Rob Roy, this is the second tribute to a legendary Scottish hero, this time round William Wallace, the great medieval warrior leader. Though less clever than its predecessor, it is much grander in its nearly three-hour epic sweep.
The obvious comparison is with Henry V (the Olivier, not the Branagh), and even though Randall Wallace may not be quite so good a screenwriter as Shakespeare, the movie can hold its own. Randall Wallace calls himself the spiritual descendant of William Wallace, and he has deftly incorporated the not many known facts about his namesake, and addressed the legend with gusto and eloquence. The result is an epic that, a few excessively romantic touches notwithstanding, is more realistic than most. These medieval Scots live in ferocious-looking hovels, seem (at least the men) heroically unwashed, and have coiffures in which a kestrel could nest. The friendly punches with which they communicate could easily kill a lesser fellow -- an Englishman, say. Braveheart aims to be a thinking man's epic. ``It's our wits that make us men,'' young William's da tells him, and, after da and big brother are killed by the English, Uncle Argyll continues the boy's ecation along similar lines. Pretty soon William has turned into Mel Gibson, a young man who wants to settle down and live in peace. But the English are making things hard, what with such things as ius primae noctis (in the film, more tersely but less correctly, the prima nocte) giving the English magistrate the right to deflower each lassie on her wedding night. Braveheartrending business, that. Finally William secretly marries the bonniest of lasses, Murron -- played by the breathtakingly beautiful and talented Catherine McCormack -- but the English get wind of it, and when she won't put out for them, slit her throat in a shattering scene irradiated by Miss McCormack's performance. So William turns avenger and, by one small further step, leader of the Scottish populace (as opposed to the nobles, suborned by Edward Longshanks, the Machiavellian English king). There are plots and counterplots as the nobles sabotage William's efforts, and Robert the Bruce, who wants to help him, is prevented by his leprous father (well played by Ian Bannen), who expects the nobles to crown his son king. And much, much more. The love scenes are so-so, the political scenes ho-hum, but the fighting -- both indivial contests and mass battle scenes -- is first-rate, barbaric, and sublime. You might think that so much battle stuff would pall after a while: how much slashing, chopping, stabbing, and skewering -- not to mention mangling and incinerating -- can there be without diminishing returns? Quite a bit; Gibson, to give him his e, comes up with new forms of warfare, better ways to turn charging men and horses into shishkebabs, new modes of battering down castle gates in a rain of boiling pitch from the battlements, fresh tricks to outsmart the enemy. And whereas this much violence with modern weapons would be unbearable, with medieval arms it becomes heroic and exhilarating. There is something appealing about Mel Gibson -- the ruggedly masculine countenance, the quick half-smile, the knack of conveying blue-eyed hurt (as when he discovers the Bruce under an enemy helmet), and a squarer-jawed determination than Dick Tracy's -- that sustains Braveheart even through the unlikely scenes with Isabelle, the Princess of Wales (indifferently played by Sophie Marceau), and through the Wallace's -- or the Gibson's -- unconvincing displays of polyglotism. Add to this the beauties of Scotland, searchingly chronicled by John Toll's inexhaustible camera, the solid supporting performances among which Patrick McGoohan's sardonic-sadistic Edward I is especially noteworthy (never before have terminal consonants been drawn out to such ironic length), and the intelligently deployed music by James Horner. A Scottish acquaintance, George Campbell, questions the use of the sweeter uilleann (Irish) bagpipes rather than the fiercer Highland ones ring the battle scenes, but these scenes are so exciting Horner could have used marimbas and I wouldn't have noticed. The film put me in mind of a four-line poem by Scotland's greatest modern poet, Hugh MacDiarmid: The rose of all the world is not for me. I want for my part Only the little white rose of Scotland that smells sharp and sweet -- And breaks the heart. And that is high praise.
4
What is there that can be said about Braveheart that hasn』t been said before? It』s an epic movie that ought to be in the conversation about the best films of the past thirty years. And actually, 「epic」 might be too small of a word. Braveheart is as much about the inner drama of William Wallace as it is about the life-and-death drama of the war for Scotland』s independence in the late 13th, early 14th centuries. It』s a story told on a grand scale with a great deal craft – and flair (and humor). This is a movie that offers both style and substance. It』s a direct precursor to the success of the Lord of the Rings movies – indeed, one can argue that the success of Braveheart set the stage for those films. True, Braveheart may not have universal appeal in terms of genre, story, or its brutal portrayal of war. But there can be little doubt of the value of a film that is, simply, one of the best I have ever seen.
The success of the film rests on the balance with which the story unfolds. Put simply, there』s something here for everyone: romance, action, character, philosophy, conflict, cinematography, great lines, music, and so on … and it all fits together almost flawlessly. I』m sure if you looked hard enough you could find fault with some parts of the movie, but considering its nearly three-hour run time it manages to avoid pitfalls remarkably well.
This is William Wallace』s story. And through him, the audience is allowed a mirror with which to view itself. This is the true measure of a great story: its ability to not only provide commentary, but also to provoke introspection. And that happens here quite often. One of the film』s most quoted lines is 「Every man dies, not every man really lives.」 Within just those seven words there is a great deal of thought and sentiment. It encapsulates a philosophy, a raison d』être, that anyone can immediately identify with. And it』s a beautiful philosophy – like carpe diem. And it encourages us to find the purpose and meaning within our lives on a daily basis.
This is also a love story, between William Wallace and Murron – a childhood friend. Theirs is a story that flows effortlessly from childhood tragedy and bonding, to althood romance and marriage. Indeed, it is Murron』s murder that proves to be Wallace』s motivation to launch his personal war against England whose king, Edward 『the Longshanks』 is portrayed with a powerfully brutality in the film, making him a very compelling villain.
Wallace』s quest is joined by a cast that is quite adept in their roles. There are hardly any weak links in the acting of this movie, which means that the underlying themes and conflicts are portrayed to maximum effect from start to finish. Mel Gibson』s directing certainly has to be credited for some of that success.
This is, without question, Gibson』s film. And it』s not without a certain part of vanity from the lead actor and director. If you were looking for a critique, this would be the most fertile ground for it. But for the most part, whatever vanity Gibson may have been displaying is overshadowed by the craft of everything else. The action is riveting, the dialogue is crisp (and profound) and the music is deeply, deeply moving.
James Horner』s score successfully taps into the heritage of Scotland while displaying a full orchestral presentation. The instrumentation and arrangements are all very well done, from wavering flute to the bagpipes to the thunderous percussion ring battle sequences.
5
I used to think that the history of Scotland around the end of the thirteenth century was one of those really complicated and messy affairs that could send any historian into a fit of sobbing. So imagine my surprise as I discovered it's really all about a bunch of rowdy guys mooning each other across a battlefield and then playing dodgeball.
"Braveheart" is one of those audacious films that implies that war is "bad" by putting the violence at the forefront, slowing it down and tossing in lots of extra blood, piercings, stabbings, castrations, amputations and assorted mutilations with random insertions of Mel's butt -- just to make sure that the women get into it too. This is all topped off by a really long and protracted moment where the camera lovingly dotes on Mel Gibson as he is taken to a platform to be tortured. It's the kind of moment that makes preschoolers point to the screen and say, "Christ figure! Christ figure!" Either that or: "Look! He's shamelessly grooming himself for the Oscars!" (Oscar committees love Christ figures.)
After three delirious hours the message is clear: Buy an ax, kill a lot of people, wear a kilt, show your butt, screw a princess and (if you have some time left over) repeat this over and over and over and over and over... until you get caught. If ever a movie cried out for a halftime break, this was it.
❽ 電影勇敢的心，英文觀後感
I
remember seeing this movie for the first time in late 2003, and I was
impressed. I saw it again last night, and I was even more impressed. The
acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant. For me, all my guesses
were incorrect. Everything that happens in this movie in unpredicted.
The last half hour itself was highly unpredictable, and it had a
powerful message. When a scene was meant to be dramatic, they did a
great job at it. I don't know about everybody else, but the ending did
make me cry. The message the movie sent kept me thinking for a while.
The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable, there was barely
any faults or anything wrong with the movie. For a movie of 1995, they
did a great job.
I absolutely guarantee this movie to anybody who
enjoys action and war with a bit of drama mixed in. One of the best, or
maybe even the best movie of the 20th century.
19 November 2005 | by Sheldon Eyzenga
(Canada)