㈠ 电影建国大业怎么样值得一看吗
《建国大业》虽然是一部弘扬主旋律的电影,但是很好地综合了政治,评价和票房,剧中大牌云集,互飙演技,宣扬的爱国情怀让人热血沸腾,非常值得一看。
㈡ 通俗的讲什么是讲政治
通俗的讲什么是讲政治?什么是“政治”
《现代汉语词典》(2005年版),政治的定义是:
政府、政党、社会团体和个人在内政及国际关系方面的活动。政治是经济的集中表现,它产生于一定的经济基础,并为经济基础服务,同时极大地影响经济的发展。
《辞海》(2009年版),政治的定义是:
(1)经济的集中体现。产生于一定的经济基础,又为经济基础服务,给予经济发展以巨大影响,并在社会上层建筑中居于统率地位。
在阶级社会里,各对立阶级为维护自己的经济利益,彼此之间必然展开激烈的阶级斗争。因此,阶级斗争、处理阶级关系成为政治的重要内容。
政治所要处理的主要是国家生活中的各种关系,包括阶级内部的关系,阶级、阶层、各类群体之间的关系,民族关系以及国际关系等,并表现为代表一定阶级、阶层的政党、社会集团、社会势力在国家生活和国际关系方面的政策和活动。
(2)政事得以治理。《说苑·敬慎》:“〔晋〕政治内定,则举兵而伐卫。”
何为政治?言人人殊。孙中山认为,“政就是众人之事,治就是管理,管理众人之事,就是政治。”亚里士多德说得更单纯,“政治的目标是追求至善。”无论“政治”如何定义,无论怎么“讲政治”,都应该意识到民生就是最大的政治。何为民生?就是人民的生活、社会的生存、国民的生机。
㈢ 中国国产电影中有没有讲政治博弈很厉害的电影
背靠背,脸对脸 (1994) 相当不错,中国难得讲官场的电影
背靠背,脸对脸的剧情简介 · · · · · ·
王双立(牛振华 饰)是某地文化馆的代馆长,这个馆长一代就是好几年,想升也升不上去,却也没有其他变动。不料一天,来了新的文化馆长老马(雷恪生 饰),这让王双立离正馆长的距离更远了。新馆长老马原是个副乡长,王双立认为他是个土包子,心里很是不以为然,利用自己对文化馆人际关系熟 悉的优势,想方设法给老马出难题。经过几轮较量,老马终于被挤走,王双立又成了代馆长,再次受领导重用,岂料,螳螂捕蝉黄雀在后,秘书小阎(李强 饰)成了新一任馆长。王双立不甘心,再次和小阎斗法,想将对方挤走,这次王双立还能如愿与偿吗?
电影《背靠背,脸对脸》获得第二届大学生电影节最佳故事片和最佳男主角奖、东京国际电影节最佳男主角奖、第15届金鸡奖最佳导演和最佳合作片奖、第14届香港电影金像奖十大华语片。
㈣ 讲政治 怎么讲 至少有五个具体要求
一要服从组织,二要牢记党的宗旨,三要按党员标准要求自己。四要做党联系群众的纽带。五要发挥先锋模范作用
㈤ 电影《夺冠》观后感
电影《夺冠》观后感五篇
㈥ 什么是讲政治
讲政治:它内涵非常丰富,包括政治方向、政治立场、政治观点、政治纪律、政治鉴别力、政治敏锐性等诸多方面。明代汪天赐在《官箴集要》中说:“正则不为邪所媚。”而正与不正,实际上就是一个政治方向的问题,它反映着从政以什么为目的、以什么为核心、以什么为基础。做为一名党员干部,只有自觉践行党的宗旨,才能得到人民群众的支持和拥护,才有施展才能、实现人生价值的舞台。
㈦ 《建国大业》主要内容
主要内容:
《建国大业》讲述了从1945年抗日战争结束到1949年建国前夕过程中发生的一系列故事,影片以第一届中国人民政治协商会议的筹备为主线,反映了新中国成立前夕的那段风云岁月。该片较之以往的主旋律电影有新的突破,其中一些鲜为人知的故事被挖掘、表现。其中就有蒋介石与蒋经国父子之间关系的深入描写。

《建国大业》是2009年上映的一部中国历史电影,是庆祝中华人民共和国成立60周年的献礼作品。本片由黄建新执导,韩三平担任制片人,云集了华语影坛百余位明星客串(零片酬)的影片。
影片讲述了从抗日战争结束到1949年中华人民共和国建国前夕发生的一系列故事,主线是中国人民政治协商会议第一届全体会议的筹备,突出了当时中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商制度的形成。
影片评价:
《建国大业》票房已成功超越亿元大关。而从弘扬主旋律的角度看,这样一部政治性极强的影片获得如此广泛关注和传播,宣传效果也十分突出。讲政治和赚钞票在这部片子身上实现了理想的结合。(新华网 2014-09-15 )
这部电影摆脱了对蒋介石的丑化,较能符合当时蒋介石在抗战后人格的形象。(2009年09月25日11:16国际先驱导报)
㈧ 急求:《末代独裁》电影的英语影评
At first glance the film when in fact nothing of interest, the dictatorship of the film also has a lot of reading, is nothing but talk about how the rule of a monarch of how good, how Hengzhengbaolian how, and so on, but did not expect was to see later There continue to urge them are listed, as this film does much more than others in different places.
A young Scottish doctor Gary Kong, because condolences to participate in medical mission arrived in Uganda and are subject to the then military dictator Amin of Uganda's appreciation, he also left behind when the Queen's physician. Self-proclaimed "The Last King of Scotland", Amin, Gary Kong as their favorite son like him ... enjoy high position and great wealth, which makes Gary feel flattered Kong. Gary Young Kong is a result of worship Amin, and even made him all the atrocities, take it for granted. For everywhere, and strong destructive and sophisticated weapons, have turned a blind eye to Gary Kong; even see Amin against the dissidents were horrible massacre, he also ignored. Until one day when he found himself being classified as Amin's henchmen, he was suddenly aware of their abhorrent side.
First, the film's narrative point of view. The film is not the same as with other films, it is not directly reflect the description of a tyrant to his cruel, but to a third party's point of view, a third party in order to experience a contrast to General Amin's vicious. Some people may think that this movie lacks great meaning, politics put unclear, in particular, some understanding of the historical background, the story is too easy way out, placed a tyrant, "General Amin," the astonishing political, not an alarming incident But Nongmochongcai performance to a white man of Africa's political adventure, the two three bizarre extra-marital affairs with the surging passion of the sensational repeatedly rubbing the lens was actually a desecration of the truth of history, of contempt for the people of Africa ... ... the view, Of course, not surprisingly, worthy of respect, but as far as I am concerned, the story of the British way, is about people and nature as the key link, a careless trip to the muddy water of the soul of young people from the ups and downs for clues to the story together, this is The new film is located. The subject matter of course, numerous types of law making, can be very political, very bloody, very calm, very documentary, the very ideology ... but ... the world of mainstream film aesthetic trends, the current is also a matter of fact it is two words: popular. A user-friendly and fully expressed their wish to express my understanding of the film is the most successful.
Second, this film will portray the character of two very profound, regardless of whether the film is true, are very credible, after the actors perform well, is more of a menace. Inside the main character Dr. Gary Young Kong is a very impulsive and very naive young man, after graating from the various actions, such as after-school presumptuous of water, their eyes closed were the future of the globe to come to a decision, he can be seen The idea is still very impulsive and very bold, and the lack of rational thinking that finally led to his blind worship, and when he met Amin when he was actually kind of nice appearance and the language of gains, and He highlighted the naive character, in the end his fate is a matter of course. As Amin's personality, not to mention, Xiaolicang, Ayutthaya is a deep, but when he tells his own childhood, we found that, in fact, he is a poor man who had experienced We have not experienced If we follow his childhood experiences, I think most of us may choose to degenerate it! He stood there and the highest point, despite his brutal rule, but in the end is also a kind of extreme methods of rule, although he did was inhumane, but I still have to admire that he does have such a leadership, when He Gary Kong sanctions, he had tears falling down, we can see that he is not a callous person. He and everyone from the exchange point of view, his Ayutthaya especially profound in his Gary Kong exchange, will soon be able to win public support, so that there is no doubt that Gary Kong's allegiance to his own, although not its own He said then, however, this ability is very admirable.
Of course, a good script coupled with good character of a good film is far from sufficient, in which the main body of the actor's performance I think is the biggest film success. Among the leading man to become a best actor Academy Award winner Forest Intervet Hackett is really well-deserved. "The Last King of Scotland" at the end, the director placed a picture of the reality of Amin, his air of action, after I have read more forest sigh Intervet Hackett's performance has been superb, and his performances so I think he is Amin, Not only because it is the same black, also has a stout body, even his eyes each and every trick, even temperament and are similar. Among the other actors, despite not the best actor Academy Award-winning, but their superb acting is not in doubt is precisely because of these fine actors, only so much to win the support of the film's audience.
Finally, the film's narrative rhythm there is also a degree of relaxation. Foster in "Aspects of the novel", had "rhythm" as a novel to be an important aspect of the study, saying that "the pace handles the issue well on hate most, it will be rigid as a symbol, not to lead us forward, Instead, we will stumble, "The same can be applied to the film and on. The whole rhythm of the film compact, Diedang ups and downs, thrilling. At the end of the film are generally sensational climax, and other films of the same subject matter compared to "The Last King of Scotland" fan in place more to do and more accurate. • director Kevin Macdonald should get this year's best director award.
And the history of film of the same type of comparison, I think this film is more human, more ecational significance, gives the impression of a more profound. Is not only cruel but also because the film a few scenes of violence, because the film is more unique narrative perspective, as well as the excellent actor. As a result, I am very satisfied with the film.
初看这部电影的时候其实是没什么兴趣的,对于独裁的片子也看了也不少了,无非就是讲一个君主的统治怎么怎么不好,怎么怎么横征暴敛等等,但看到后来没想到居然有继续看下去的冲动,因为这部片子确有跟别的不同的地方。
一个苏格兰的青年医师盖瑞岗,因为参加医疗慰问团而来到乌干达,不但受到当时乌干达的军事独裁者阿敏的赏识,还被留下来当他的御用医师。自诩为“末代独裁”的阿敏,把盖瑞岗当作是自己儿子般地宠爱,让他享尽荣华富贵…,这使盖瑞岗感到受宠若惊。年轻的盖瑞岗于是非常崇拜阿敏,甚至将他所做的一切暴行,都视之为理所当然。对于随处可见、毁灭性强的先进武器,盖瑞岗都视若无睹;就算看到反对阿敏的异议份子惨遭可怕的屠杀,他也不闻不问。直到有一天,当他发现自己被大家归为阿敏的党羽时,他才猛然觉悟到自己令人憎恶的一面。
首先是这部片子的叙述角度。这部片子跟别的片子不一样,它并不是直接通过描写暴君来体现他的残忍的,而是以一个第三者的角度,以一个第三者的经历来反衬出将军阿敏的狠毒。有些人可能觉得这电影没啥大意思,讲政治讲得不清不楚,尤其了解点儿历史背景的,更是嫌故事避重就轻,放着暴君“阿敏将军”的惊人政治、惊人事件不表,却浓墨重彩地表现一个白人小伙子的非洲政治历险,更把三两段奇形怪状的婚外情用激情澎湃的煽情镜头反复揉搓,简直就是对历史真相的亵渎,对非洲人民的蔑视……这样的观点出现,当然不奇怪,值得尊重,但就我而言,英国人的故事手法,以人为本,以性为纲,以一个不小心趟了浑水的年轻人的灵魂跌宕起伏的起承转合为故事线索,正是这部电影的新意所在。这个题材当然还有无数种拍法,可以非常政治、非常血腥、非常冷静、非常纪实、非常意识形态……但世界电影的主流审美趋向,目前来讲其实还就是那两个字:通俗。一个通俗易懂,并且能完全表达出自己想表达的片子我认识就是最成功的。
其次这部片子将两人的性格刻画的十分深刻,不管这部片子是否确有其事,都是十分可信的,经过演员们的精心表演,更加的是如虎添翼。里面主人公青年医师盖瑞岗是一个十分冲动并且又十分天真的年轻人,从他毕业后的种种举动,比如下课后的放肆戏水,对自己的未来居然闭着眼睛转地球仪来决定,可见他的思想还是很冲动的,很冒失的,缺乏理智的思考,以至于最后导致他的盲目崇拜,而当他遇到阿敏的时候居然又被他那慈祥的外表和和蔼的语言所蒙蔽,又突出了他天真的性格,因此,到最后他的下场也是理所当然的。至于阿敏的性格就更不用说了,笑里藏刀,是一个城府很深的人,但当他讲述自己童年的时候,我们才发现,其实他又是个可怜的人,他所经历的我们并没有经历过的,如果我们跟他一样童年的遭遇的话,我想也许我们大部分人会选择堕落吧!而他确站在最高点,他的统治尽管残酷,但终究也是一种偏激的统治方法,虽然他的做法是很不人道的,但我仍然不得不钦佩他这样一个确实有领导能力的人,当他对盖瑞岗进行制裁的时候,他掉下了眼泪,可见,他也并不是一个麻木不仁的人。从他与每个人的交流上来看,他的城府尤为深刻,在他对盖瑞岗进行交流的时候,很快便能收买人心,让盖瑞岗毫无置疑的去效忠自己,尽管自己并不是他自己说的那么好,不过,这种能力还是很令人佩服的。
当然,一个好的剧本加上好的人物性格对一部好片子是远远不够的,其中的主体,演员的表演我觉得才是影片最大的成功之处。当中的男主角能成为奥斯卡最佳男演员奖的得主福里斯特威克特真的是当之无愧。《末代独裁》的结尾,导演安插了现实的阿敏的画面,他的神态动作,我看过之后更加感叹福里斯特威克特的表演精湛了,他的表演让我觉得他就是阿敏,不仅是因为同是黑人,同样具有肥硕的身躯,就连他的每个眼神,每个小动作,甚至是气质都是及其相似的。其中的其他演员尽管没有获得奥斯卡最佳男演员的殊荣,但他们的精湛演技是毋庸置疑的,正是有了这些优秀的演员,才赢得了这么多支持这部片子的观众。
最后,这部片子的叙事节奏也是张弛有度的。 福斯特在《小说面面观》中,曾把“节奏”作为小说的一个重要方面加以考察,认为“节奏处理得不好就最使人讨厌,它会僵化为一种象征,不是带领我们前进,反而会把我们绊倒“,同样的道理也可以应用与电影上。整部片子节奏紧凑,跌荡起伏、扣人心弦。片子结尾一般都是煽情的高潮,和其他同样题材的片子相比较,《末代独裁》煽得更到位,拿捏更准。导演凯文•麦克唐纳才应该得今年的最佳导演奖。
与同类型的历史片相比较,我觉得此片更有了人性,更有了教育的意义,给人的印象更加的深刻。不仅仅是因为片中几处残忍而且暴力的镜头,更多的是因为本片独具特色的叙述视角,以及优秀的演员。因此,我对这部电影十分的满意。
㈨ 讲政治斗争的电影,美国的,英国的都行。要经典。美剧就不要了,没时间追。电影!!!
真相至上 影子写手 总统杀局 饥饿 慕尼黑惨案 对话尼克松 告密者 选票风波 不惧风暴 还有巴西电影 精英部队1.2也很经典